Abstract Submission Guideline 2023-12-07T12:57:31+00:00

Abstract submission guideline

Abstract submission for 37th conference is closed now

Conference scopes

  • Microbial Pathogens, diagnosis and control
  • Antimicrobial Agents & Resistance
  • Clinical Infections and Vaccines
  • Epidemiology and Public Health Microbiology
  • Microbial forensics
  • Microbial Cytology and Microbial Physiology
  • Cellular Microbiology & Systems Microbiology
  • Plant Pathology
  • Veterinary Microbiology
  • Microbiology of food including spoilage, Fermentation and Probiotics
  • Food analysis and quality assurance
  • Industrial Microbiology, Microbial Biotechnology and Future Bioindustries
  • Drug discovery, development and Molecular biology
  • Microbial production of chemicals an biopharmaceuticals
  • Green and Sustainable Technology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  • Environmental Pollution and Control
  • Microbial Ecology and Evolution
  • Aquatic & Marine Microbiology
  • Renewable Energy
  • Molecular Microbiology

The submitted abstracts will be selected for publication and oral/poster presentation based on the scientific quality of the research work judged by the scientific committee.

GUIDELINES FOR ABSTRACT SUBMISSION:

    • All abstracts must be submitted through email at bsmabstractsubmission@gmail.com as attachment. Receipt of the submission will be confirmed by email
    • The abstract should be concise and factual (maximum length 300 words excluding Keywords and Acknowledgment)).
    • The abstract must have a structured format, i.e., Introduction, Methods, Results, Conclusion.
    • Title should be concise and informative, within 20 ~25 words.
    • Try to avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible.
    • The title of the abstract will be followed by authors names and affiliation.
    • Please clearly mention the given name(s) and family name(s) of each author and make sure that all names are accurately spelled. Presenting author’s name should be underlined and the corresponding author’s name should have an asterisk.
    • Presenting author’s E-mail should be mentioned
    • Write down background and objectives of the study in introduction in 2-3 sentences.
    • Briefly mention the methods employed for the study.
    • Write down the findings of the study concisely
    • Draw a conclusion by exploring the significance of the result, do not repeat the result
    • Do not cite references in the abstract
    • Mention keywords and acknowledgment (if any) after the conclusion

FONT:

  • Title: Times new roman 11pt
  • Authors name and affiliations: Times new roman 11pt regular.
  • Abstract body: Times new roman 11pt with single

 

Sample Abstract

Contamination Risk of Shallow Groundwater by Faecal Microbes from Land-applied Animal Manure

*Mr A and Mr B

Institution Address

E-mail:

Introduction:

Animal manure is widely applied to agricultural land as a source of nutrient and organic matter, but it can spread harmful contaminants to the surface environment and groundwater. Different faecal microorganisms from land-applied animal manure can join shallow groundwater through leaching. Thus, a study was conducted to investigate the leaching rate of microbial contaminants from manure-treated soil under rice-maize-rice rotation.

Materials and Methods:

The experiment was set in a lysimeter having nine‘1.2 m × 1.2 m × 1.2 m’soil column with a provision of irrigation water application and leachate water collection. Different treatments studied under the crop rotation during 2018–2019 were dry manure application, raw manure application, alternate wetting and drying irrigation, and ponding irrigation depending on the crop season. Leached water samples were collected using sterilized devices after six major rainfall events; one from aman rice season, two from maize season and three from boro rice season. Total faecal coliform (TFC) in leachate samples (CFU/ml) were detected by plate count. An EMB agar media and peptone reagent were used to specify faecal bacteria.

Results:

In aman rice season, manure application had significantly higher rate of TFC (5.5×106 CFU/ml) than non-manure treatment (8.2×104 CFU/ml). Ponding irrigation (1.6×105 CFU/ml) increased one log scale TFC concentration compared to alternate wetting and drying irrigation. In maize season, manure application increased up to two log scale concentration of TFC than non-manure treatment. High concentration of TFC (3×105 CFU/ml) for a prolonged time was observed for raw manure application compared to dry manure application. In boro season TFC rate was also significantly higher (3.3×107 CFU/ml) in manure applied soil compared to non-manure soil (3.4×105 CFU/ml).

Conclusion:

The study suggests that manure application should be properly handled to protect soil and water environment and to produce safe food.